| BahanClan.com |
|
The Bahan family adventure journal
|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 |
We have rabbits in the family
Extra! Extra!
On order
Push it!!!
Date night
Patience
Digital dreams
Fox News
Dot COM bomb
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
| January 2004 |
| « December 2003 | February 2004 » |
|
Nice pics Cam -- I particularly enjoyed the power poles, and the right-most swamp lands shot. Posted by: Krishen at February 1, 2004 4:16 AMThose swamp pictures are awesome. Of course now you're setting the precedent of having lots of pictures on your site. I hope you can keep up! Posted by: orque at February 1, 2004 6:54 PM |
|
|
|
Fun pictures. Looks like the shutter speed was a bit slow. Hard to take good action shots in the dark though. Posted by: John at January 28, 2004 8:10 PMI think that was the intention. She and Rod were talking about how the different shutter speeds changes the picture. Posted by: Cameron at January 29, 2004 7:50 AMYeah. Just have to figure out what shutter speed will get you the image you want. One interesting trick is to set the shutter speed kinda long (1/10 or so) and pan with the players as they run by. If you do it right, they'll appear clear in the center while the background has all the motion blur. It's a bit easier to do with cars and such since they don't have legs and arms flailing about like people do. Posted by: John at January 29, 2004 5:16 PMHeh, nice shot John. Yeah, that's exactly what Rod was saying to Melissa. Definitely agreed about the limbs. Pesky buggers! :) Posted by: krishen at January 30, 2004 11:29 AM |
|
Congrats on the new camera. I expect to see at least as many pictures from you as I've posting. Gotta keep people informed you know. Posted by: John at January 27, 2004 10:53 AMCongrats!!! I expect to see that picture gallery link updated ASAP :) Posted by: Krishen at January 27, 2004 10:37 PM |
|
nice shots!! i particularly like the shot second from the bottom, was that one melissa took while hanging out on a tree branch? Posted by: Krishen at January 28, 2004 10:15 PM |
|
|
|
Oh man!! You're never gonna let that picture die are you? :: laughs :: Arrr, I hear "Pirates..." is pretty good, gonna have to watch it at some point! Posted by: krishen at January 19, 2004 8:11 AM |
|
Stay away from the Powershot G5. It's supposed to have some pretty bad artifacts when viewing a bright light on a mostly dark background (they'll appear as purple halos around the light source). in digicam-speak, they're called "chromatic aberations", and the G5 is worse about them than the G3, which in turn is worse (but only slightly) than the G2. a review of the G5: http://hardwarecentral.dealtime.com/xPR-Canon_PowerShot_G5~RD-104580419204 "Both my friend and I were very impressed with the G5, however the newest member of the “G” family isn’t perfect, there are couple of annoying faults. First, the G5 has slightly above average chromatic aberration (purple fringing) in high contrast images. Chromatic aberration is a fact of digital camera life, especially at larger apertures in bright or high contrast scenes. Most digital camera lenses lose the purple fringing as soon as you stop down one f-stop from the maximum aperture, but the G5 still showed some purple fringing at f4.0." I would definitely recommend the Powershot G3, though. I've never had so much fun with toy. One caveat... and I'm not sure if it's specific to my G3: the CCD seems to capture yellows with better saturation than blues, so sunsets, and pictures of oranges will look fantastic, but your skies, not so much. but you'd only notice if you were really looking hard. overall the picture quality is really quite good, especially in large areas of very similar colours (traditionally an area where compression artifacts are very noticeable in digital cameras -- but not on the G3). Posted by: krishen at January 14, 2004 6:03 PMIt doesn't fit in your budget, but if you want a camera with interchangeable lenses, you can't beat a Digital SLR. I've got a Canon Digital Rebel, and the image quality is outstanding. With the camera set on Large/Fine JPEG mode, you get 6.3 megapixel images with no visible compression artifacts. The images are smooth as silk, especially when shooting at the lower ISO speeds. 100 ISO shows no visible noise. 200-400 start to show just a little, just as you would expect from film. 800 and 1600 ISO shows a little bit of it, but it is far less noisy than real 35 mm film ever could be. It can take the entire line of Canon EF lenses, from their 15 mm fish-eye wide angle to the 1200 mm super-telephoto. I've borrowed Mike's 100-300 mm telephoto on occasion to take a few distance shots, but the 18-55 mm lens included in the kit is great for a wide range of photos. For only $999, it's a steal, but unless you really want to get into photography as a hobby, it'll probably be overkill for you. Posted by: John at January 14, 2004 6:52 PMForgot to add: If you want some examples photos, check out my gallery. Posted by: John at January 14, 2004 6:53 PM |
|
Sweet Tandy...I see it's making the rounds. Posted by: Jeff at January 9, 2004 3:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"portal" ;-) how about updating that picture gallery? Posted by: Krishen at January 4, 2004 10:53 AMI agree! I'm still waiting to see more than the "first" wedding photos, and that was over two years ago. :P Posted by: orque at January 5, 2004 9:17 PMWell ... honestly so am I. It has been on hold since I don't have many "pictures" to put up. Suppose that I do have some stolen from Krishen ... hmmm ... I will see what I can do. Posted by: Cameron Bahan at January 6, 2004 9:38 AMdon't let him fool you. He has 608 pic at his disposal Posted by: Melissa Bahan at January 13, 2004 11:46 AM |
|
|



























Sounds like you're having fun with the camera. Need to make sure you check the white balance setting. I'm always forgetting to reset it. It can make a huge difference in the coloring of the images.
Keep shooting and you'll definitely get better. If you're looking for advice, I can recommend a good site.
Posted by: John at February 1, 2004 1:28 AM